Scientific Paper
Containing AI: from responsible to critical AI governance
Paul Schütze; Benedetta Brevini · 2026-08-27
What it covers
Critiques responsible-AI governance through the lens of environmental and social costs and proposes critical AI governance that questions whether particular AI systems should be developed.
Who it helps
Intended audience has not been documented.
Limitations
Official Springer article and abstract reviewed October 9, 2026. Published August 27, 2026 in AI & SOCIETY, Open Forum. Conceptual/normative argument, not empirical measurement of environmental savings. Authors Paul Schütze and Benedetta Brevini.
Show citation
Paul Schütze; Benedetta Brevini. 2026-08-27. Containing AI: from responsible to critical AI governance. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03337-7 (AI & Environment Resource Hub; record paper-containing-ai-critical-governance-2026; collection snapshot 2026-10-18).
Classification and context
Included in the original Scientific Paper collection. Labels below are metadata based suggestions. They are not verified findings, claims of effectiveness, or endorsements.
Definitions, inclusion guidance, and examples →
Available source metadata
- Author or creator
- Paul Schütze; Benedetta Brevini
- Publisher
- AI & SOCIETY
- Publication date
- 2026-08-27
- Date precision
- day
- Geographic scope
- Unknown
- Language
- unknown
- Peer review
- unknown
- Source access
- Not checked
- Metadata confidence
- Metadata unconfirmed
- Last verified
- Not yet verified
- Snapshot import
- 2026-10-18
- Legacy domain
- Governance, Justice & Society
- Legacy subdomain
- Critical AI governance
- journal
- AI & SOCIETY
- source evidence
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03337-7
- metadata reviewed at
- 2026-10-09
- review evidence
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03337-7
- context reviewed at
- 2026-10-09
Provenance and review
- Source access
- Not checked
- Metadata confidence
- Metadata unconfirmed
- Editorial relevance
- Governance, justice, and political economy
- Evidence quality
- Evidence quality has not been separately assessed.
Source sheet: Scientific Paper · Row 532 · Original ID: paper-containing-ai-critical-governance-2026.
View source spreadsheet ↗
A paper listing is not a quality assessment. Peer review and findings require source-level confirmation. Source link has not yet been checked. The import date is not the original date added.
Suggest a correction for this record →Newsletter appearances
Publication, placement, and evidence are tracked separately. A legacy coverage flag alone does not prove an appearance.
Related through shared environmental topics
Ordered by the number of shared provisional topic labels. This indicates a browsing connection, not agreement between sources.
Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society
Scientific Paper · 2026-10-15
Fieke Jansen analyzes 26 position papers from an internet sustainability workshop, arguing that technical efficiency approaches can obscure wider resource limits and the politics of infrastructure growth.
Source: Internet Policy ReviewNot checked · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society
Organization · Africa
Endorsed by G7 leaders and powered by MIMIT, the AI Hub is re-imaging global AI partnerships with Africa.
Source: OrganizationExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society
Organization · Other
ERC is a network of journalists and newsrooms, all dedicated to investigating environmental crimes collaboratively.
Source: OrganizationExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society
Multimedia · 2026-09-16
Green Software Brighton hosts Fiona MacNeill on sustainability decisions made by contractors and Mark Buss on OVO's collaborative responsible AI strategy.
Source: MultimediaExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed