Scientific Paper

Containing AI: from responsible to critical AI governance

Paul Schütze; Benedetta Brevini · 2026-08-27

What it covers

Critiques responsible-AI governance through the lens of environmental and social costs and proposes critical AI governance that questions whether particular AI systems should be developed.

Who it helps

Intended audience has not been documented.

Limitations

Official Springer article and abstract reviewed October 9, 2026. Published August 27, 2026 in AI & SOCIETY, Open Forum. Conceptual/normative argument, not empirical measurement of environmental savings. Authors Paul Schütze and Benedetta Brevini.

Show citation

Paul Schütze; Benedetta Brevini. 2026-08-27. Containing AI: from responsible to critical AI governance. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03337-7 (AI & Environment Resource Hub; record paper-containing-ai-critical-governance-2026; collection snapshot 2026-10-18).

Classification and context

Included in the original Scientific Paper collection. Labels below are metadata based suggestions. They are not verified findings, claims of effectiveness, or endorsements.

pathway

topic

lifecycle

orientation

Definitions, inclusion guidance, and examples →

Available source metadata

Author or creator
Paul Schütze; Benedetta Brevini
Publisher
AI & SOCIETY
Publication date
2026-08-27
Date precision
day
Geographic scope
Unknown
Language
unknown
Peer review
unknown
Source access
Not checked
Metadata confidence
Metadata unconfirmed
Last verified
Not yet verified
Snapshot import
2026-10-18
Legacy domain
Governance, Justice & Society
Legacy subdomain
Critical AI governance
journal
AI & SOCIETY
source evidence
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03337-7
metadata reviewed at
2026-10-09
review evidence
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03337-7
context reviewed at
2026-10-09

Provenance and review

Source access
Not checked
Metadata confidence
Metadata unconfirmed
Editorial relevance
Governance, justice, and political economy
Evidence quality
Evidence quality has not been separately assessed.

Source sheet: Scientific Paper · Row 532 · Original ID: paper-containing-ai-critical-governance-2026.

View source spreadsheet ↗

A paper listing is not a quality assessment. Peer review and findings require source-level confirmation. Source link has not yet been checked. The import date is not the original date added.

Suggest a correction for this record →

Newsletter appearances

Publication, placement, and evidence are tracked separately. A legacy coverage flag alone does not prove an appearance.

Related through shared environmental topics

Ordered by the number of shared provisional topic labels. This indicates a browsing connection, not agreement between sources.

Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society

Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society

Organization · Africa

AI Hub for Sustainable Development

Endorsed by G7 leaders and powered by MIMIT, the AI Hub is re-imaging global AI partnerships with Africa.

Source: OrganizationExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed

Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society

Organization · Other

Environmental Reporting Collective

ERC is a network of journalists and newsrooms, all dedicated to investigating environmental crimes collaboratively.

Source: OrganizationExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed

Shared topics: Cross-cutting sustainability; Governance and society

Multimedia · 2026-09-16

Fractional Influence & Responsible AI | Green Software Brighton

Green Software Brighton hosts Fiona MacNeill on sustainability decisions made by contractors and Mark Buss on OVO's collaborative responsible AI strategy.

Source: MultimediaExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed