Scientific Paper
NatureLM-Audio: an Audio-Language Foundation Model for Bioacoustics
Robinson, David; Miron, Marius; Hagiwara, Masato; Weck, Benno; Keen, Sara; Alizadeh, Milad; Narula, Gagan; Geist, Matthieu; Pietquin, Olivier · 2024-11-11
What it covers
NatureLM-audio, a language-audio model for bioacoustics, advances species detection and conservation by setting new benchmarks in animal vocalization analysis.
Who it helps
Intended audience has not been documented.
Limitations
Source-specific limitations have not been reviewed. Inclusion and topic labels do not establish effectiveness or reliability.
Show citation
Robinson, David; Miron, Marius; Hagiwara, Masato; Weck, Benno; Keen, Sara; Alizadeh, Milad; Narula, Gagan; Geist, Matthieu; Pietquin, Olivier. 2024-11-11. NatureLM-Audio: an Audio-Language Foundation Model for Bioacoustics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07186 (AI & Environment Resource Hub; record paper-034; collection snapshot 2026-10-04).
Classification and context
Included in the original Scientific Paper collection. Labels below are metadata based suggestions. They are not verified findings, claims of effectiveness, or endorsements.
Definitions, inclusion guidance, and examples →
Available source metadata
- Author or creator
- Robinson, David; Miron, Marius; Hagiwara, Masato; Weck, Benno; Keen, Sara; Alizadeh, Milad; Narula, Gagan; Geist, Matthieu; Pietquin, Olivier
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Publication date
- 2024-11-11
- Date precision
- day
- Geographic scope
- Unknown
- Language
- unknown
- Peer review
- unknown
- Source access
- Reachable at last check
- Metadata confidence
- Required metadata corroborated
- Last verified
- 2026-09-28T20:11:37.061Z
- Snapshot import
- 2026-09-06
- Legacy domain
- Biodiversity & Ecosystems
- Legacy subdomain
- Using AI to Detect Bioacoustics with Audio-Language Models
- journal
- arXiv
Provenance and review
- Source access
- Reachable at last check
- Metadata confidence
- Required metadata corroborated
- Editorial relevance
- Relevance has not been separately reviewed.
- Evidence quality
- Evidence quality has not been separately assessed.
Source sheet: Scientific Paper · Row 38 · Original ID: paper-034.
View source spreadsheet ↗
A paper listing is not a quality assessment. Peer review and findings require source-level confirmation. Source link reachable · checked 2026-09-28. Source identity and required metadata verified. The import date is not the original date added.
Suggest a correction for this record →Newsletter appearances
Publication, placement, and evidence are tracked separately. A legacy coverage flag alone does not prove an appearance.
No issue-specific evidence recorded.
Related through shared environmental topics
Ordered by the number of shared provisional topic labels. This indicates a browsing connection, not agreement between sources.
Shared topics: Biodiversity and ecosystems
Scientific Paper · 2024-12-15
Improved machine learning techniques enhance bird call detection in passive acoustic monitoring, boosting precision and biodiversity tracking in climate research.
Source: NeurIPS 2024Reachable at last check · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Biodiversity and ecosystems
Scientific Paper · 2023-09-06
This study proposes a low-cost IoT-based TinyML model that intelligently activates mosquito repellent only when an Anopheles mosquito is detected, using a 1D-CNN for efficient classification of mosquito wingbeat sounds, reducing energy waste and potential health risks.
Source: ACM Digital LibraryAutomated access restricted · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Biodiversity and ecosystems
Scientific Paper · 2025-01-08
A hybrid machine learning model improves soil respiration predictions, enhancing carbon cycle modeling and greenhouse gas management strategies.
Source: ScienceDirectAutomated access restricted · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Biodiversity and ecosystems
Scientific Paper · 2024-02-01
A deep learning-based bioacoustic AI tool enables citizen scientists and law enforcement to accurately identify traded songbird species in Asian markets, achieving 91.6% accuracy and supporting conservation efforts against overexploitation and illegal wildlife trade.
Source: Deep Learning, Biodiversity MonitoringAutomated access restricted · Metadata unconfirmed