Scientific Paper
Assessment and good practices identification among NAPs of developing countries
Diana Reckien; Stelios Grafakos; Marija Bockarjova; Indriany Lionggo; Filomena Pietrapertosa; Monica Salvia; Giulia Viero; Shivenes Shammugam; Ella Nelly Benoit; Attila Buzási; Lorenzo Chelleri; Alexandros Flamos; Nikos Kleanthis; Minal Pathak; Ayyoob Sharifi; Vassilis Stavrakas; Nicola Tollin · 2026-09-02
What it covers
A review of 60 national adaptation plans submitted by developing countries evaluates plan coverage and consistency and identifies gaps in monitoring, participation and financing.
Who it helps
Intended audience has not been documented.
Limitations
Source-specific limitations have not been reviewed. Inclusion and topic labels do not establish effectiveness or reliability.
Show citation
Diana Reckien; Stelios Grafakos; Marija Bockarjova; Indriany Lionggo; Filomena Pietrapertosa; Monica Salvia; Giulia Viero; Shivenes Shammugam; Ella Nelly Benoit; Attila Buzási; Lorenzo Chelleri; Alexandros Flamos; Nikos Kleanthis; Minal Pathak; Ayyoob Sharifi; Vassilis Stavrakas; Nicola Tollin. 2026-09-02. Assessment and good practices identification among NAPs of developing countries. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-026-00419-6 (AI & Environment Resource Hub; record atlas-ca1875363694; collection snapshot 2026-10-04).
Classification and context
Included in the original Scientific Paper collection. Labels below are metadata based suggestions. They are not verified findings, claims of effectiveness, or endorsements.
Definitions, inclusion guidance, and examples →
Available source metadata
- Author or creator
- Diana Reckien; Stelios Grafakos; Marija Bockarjova; Indriany Lionggo; Filomena Pietrapertosa; Monica Salvia; Giulia Viero; Shivenes Shammugam; Ella Nelly Benoit; Attila Buzási; Lorenzo Chelleri; Alexandros Flamos; Nikos Kleanthis; Minal Pathak; Ayyoob Sharifi; Vassilis Stavrakas; Nicola Tollin
- Publisher
- npj Climate Action
- Publication date
- 2026-09-02
- Date precision
- day
- Geographic scope
- Unknown
- Language
- unknown
- Peer review
- unknown
- Source access
- Reachable at last check
- Metadata confidence
- Metadata unconfirmed
- Last verified
- Not yet verified
- Snapshot import
- 2026-09-23
- Legacy domain
- Climate & Weather
- Legacy subdomain
- National Adaptation Plans
- journal
- npj Climate Action
- source evidence
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-026-00419-6
- metadata reviewed at
- 2026-09-22
Provenance and review
- Source access
- Reachable at last check
- Metadata confidence
- Metadata unconfirmed
- Editorial relevance
- Relevance has not been separately reviewed.
- Evidence quality
- Evidence quality has not been separately assessed.
Source sheet: Scientific Paper · Row 526 · Original ID: paper-522.
View source spreadsheet ↗
A paper listing is not a quality assessment. Peer review and findings require source-level confirmation. Source link reachable · checked 2026-09-28. Metadata not yet corroborated. The import date is not the original date added.
Suggest a correction for this record →Newsletter appearances
Publication, placement, and evidence are tracked separately. A legacy coverage flag alone does not prove an appearance.
Related through shared environmental topics
Ordered by the number of shared provisional topic labels. This indicates a browsing connection, not agreement between sources.
Shared topics: Governance and society; Climate and greenhouse gases
Scientific Paper · 2026-09-15
This article proposes a five-step state policy roadmap for data center development: conduct environmental and community impact studies, use the findings in siting decisions, reassess incentives, require large facilities to pair with off-grid clean energy and storage, and mandate community-benefit sharing. It focuses on protecting grid reliability, electricity affordability, environmental integrity, and host communities.
Source: SSRNAutomated access restricted · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Research tools and geospatial methods; Climate and greenhouse gases
Tool
Sustainable AI Group's public dashboard compares modeled AI inference energy and CO₂-eq by model, provider and session, including data center overhead assumptions. Water estimates and API are marked coming soon.
Source: ToolNot checked · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Research tools and geospatial methods; Climate and greenhouse gases
Organization · North America
Founded at Harvard and MIT, Coolant is building forestry MRV that is as accurate as LiDAR at the price of hand measurement. We use only aerial drone footage to model reforestation sites with cutting edge computer vision techniques and calculate individual tree carbon stock. In recent studies with the Ocean Foundation, we've reached over 95% accuracy of LiDAR for their mangrove restoration sites.
Source: OrganizationExcluded from automated checks · Metadata unconfirmed
Shared topics: Research tools and geospatial methods; Climate and greenhouse gases
Scientific Paper · 2026-09-02
The study compares performance, energy use, processing time, and carbon emissions across dictionaries, trained classifiers, and self-hosted open LLMs for three text-analysis tasks.
Source: Social Science Computer ReviewAutomated access restricted · Metadata unconfirmed
